Bill Whittle coldly, clinically, and ruthlessly dismantles the notion that the Hilldebeast is somehow the victim of some "vast right-wing conspiracy" when it comes to her competence and eligibility for office:

We were discussing at my school the other day how it is that someone as blatantly and obviously corrupt as Hillary Rotten Clinton is being seriously touted as the inevitable candidate for the most powerful person on Earth. The answer, as far as I can tell, is that most Americans like to say that all politicians are corrupt- but they aren't actually interested in doing anything much about that fact.

Or at least, they don't seem to be as far as Democrats are concerned.

I'm not saying that Republicans are in any way less corrupt or less full of shit. Both wings of the One Party of Big Government are evil as well as stupid; the only way we have to tell them apart is that one wing is more replete with numbnuts or hellspawn than the other.

It is instructive, however, to compare and contrast what happened with the most well-known example of Republican corruption and malfeasance, with what the Hilldebeast has done.

As most Americans are well aware, in 1972, Richard Nixon was President of the United States of America. Early in that year, the Committee for the Re-Election of the President (CREEP- a deeply unfortunate acronym if there ever was one) presented a plan to senior officials in the Nixon Administration to bug the Democratic National Committee's headquarters in the Watergate Complex. A break-in was organised and was, initially, successful, with a couple of telephones in the DNC's headquarters being bugged in the process.

The subsequent, failed, break-in was the one that made headlines and toppled the President.

The Nixon Administration did its level best to cover up the break-in and avoid the (immense) political damage that it caused. Evidence emerged that the President himself had attempted to block the FBI's investigations of the incident by claiming that it was a matter of "national security" and was therefore a matter for the CIA to investigate. Within a few days of that revelation, President Nixon resigned, doomed to go down in history with one of the worst reputations of any President.

That was considered at the time to be the worst political scandal in the history of the Presidency. It still is, as far as I know. Portions of tapes were erased, the stench of corruption reached all the way to the top, and the President himself was shown to be of, at best, questionable moral integrity.

So that's Nixon taken care of. How does that compare to the Hilldebeast and her coterie of swamp-slime?

Well, let's see...:
  • Her husband lied under oath to Congress while he was President, and lied repeatedly on camera to the American people when asked about the nature of his relationship with a White House intern;
  • Her husband is known to have LOST the "football"- the card holding the launch codes to America's nuclear arsenal, which is kind of a bigger deal than just misplacing, say, your freakin' credit card;
  • The Hilldebeast herself lied, repeatedly, for ten straight days about the precise nature and motivations behind the attack on the American mission complex in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, to the American people- even though she knew damned well that it was a premeditated Islamist attack on American property and personnel;
  • She denied requests for additional security from Ambassador Christopher Stevens at the Benghazi complex, and in so doing is at minimum indirectly responsible for the deaths of four Americans;
  • She lied about the willful misplacement, removal, and destruction of US government property;
  • She is plainly guilty of gross negligence in handling classified information and documents
And that doesn't even include the numerous examples of corruption documented in Clinton Cash and other places.

One should not expect any politician to be any kind of paragon of virtue. Politicians are human- flawed, fallible, and susceptible to any number of temptations.

But it takes a special kind of evil to be so willing to walk around with blood on one's hands, lies on one's tongue, and utter loathing for the American people in one's heart, while still wearing a smile.

Here in the real world, we refer to someone like that by a special word:
n. A person with a personality disorder indicated by a pattern of lying, cunning, manipulating, glibness, exploiting, heedlessness, arrogance, delusions of grandeur, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, disregard for morality, lack of acceptance of responsibility, callousness, and lack of empathy and remorse. Such an individual may be especially prone to violent and criminal offenses.
That is the nature of Hillary Rotten Clinton. She is the definition- the living, literal definition- of a psychopath.

And, astoundingly, incredibly, impossibly, she is being taken absolutely seriously in her quest for ultimate power, by something approaching 40% of the electorate (depending on who you're asking, obviously).

Honestly, it's hard to find an adequate point of reference that shows the sheer scale of such yammering insanity. The only analogy that comes to mind there involves teenagers, whiskey, and car keys- and quite frankly, I'd trust a shit-faced teenager with the keys to a Bugatti Veyron before I'd trust the Hilldebeast with the power of the Presidency.

At least the teenager would just kill himself and wreck a $1.6M hypercar, and maybe a few others, in the process. The Hilldebeast, on the other hand, would have absolutely no problem ordering tens of thousands to their deaths if it suited her purposes.

If this were still the country of laws and not men that its Founders envisioned, the Lizard Queen wouldn't be running for the highest office in the land. She would be in a Federal prison in stripes, not on a stage in Philadelphia in a pantsuit.

But we don't live in such a country anymore. We live instead in a place- it's not a "nation" anymore, not by any rational definition of the term- where there is one standard for the very rich and very powerful, and another for everyone else.

There isn't much point ranting about it, though. Conservatives have been ranting and raging about this sort of thing for damn near ten years, and it hasn't made the slightest quantum of difference; America continues to move toward a tyrannical one-party state under the new Romanovs, but without any of the style.

There is only one question that each one of us needs to answer: when the time comes and the moral authority of the American government collapses under its own dead weight, are you willing to fight for your nation- and not with words?

What will you do if that psychopath is elected as President?


Popular Posts