Nature's reply

Back before the nonsensical notion of homosexual marriage became an accepted, legally protected symptom of the cancer eating through the bowels of once-great Western societies, gay "rights" activists used to say, "Silence Equals Death".

Mother Nature's response to that has always been, "Diversity Equals War".

Right now, that war is merely in the skirmish phase, with low-intensity, low-value conflicts stirring at the most basic levels of society. But sooner or later- I fear sooner- these skirmishes will turn into outright war. The real kind, where innocent people get shot and burned and stabbed and raped.

If you want an idea of the way that the culture war will destroy what little is left of your educational establishment, look no further than the latest round of bat-brained idiocy that we're seeing in Lincolnshire:

Ofsted was accused of “political correctness” after downgrading a top rural primary school for effectively being too English.

The education watchdog faced a backlash from MPs and parents following the decision to penalise Middle Rasen primary in Lincolnshire for not having enough black or Asian pupils.

In a report, inspectors said the school was “not yet outstanding” because pupils’ cultural development was limited by a “lack of first-hand experience of the diverse make up of modern British society”.

The move followed a shake-up of Ofsted inspections introduced in the wake of the “Trojan Horse” plot in Birmingham to impose hard-line Muslim values in state schools.

Schools are now told to place fundamental British values at the heart of the timetable including mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs. [Didact: Apparently no one in the British political or educational establishment has sufficient schooling, wit, or intelligence to understand what the word "oxymoron" means.]

But the reforms have already been criticised for having a knock-on effect on faith schools and those dominated by pupils of a particular ethnic group.

Last month, it was claimed that a small Christian school in the Home Counties had been penalised after failing to other invite faith leaders, such as imams, in to lead assemblies.

Commenting on the latest case, Sir Edward Leigh, the Conservative MP for Gainsborough, said he had written to Nicky Morgan, the Education Secretary, “objecting strenuously to the new so-called 'equality' regulations she is implementing in schools”.

He added: “This is political correctness gone mad. Middle Rasen primary school is an outstanding school by any standards.

“Multiculturalism is an irrelevance in Lincolnshire with its low number of ethnic minorities, who are already welcomed and well-integrated into our local communities, as they should be."

The community primary school, which is based in the picturesque rural town of Market Rasen, has just 104 pupils aged four to 11.

It was handed a “satisfactory” rating during its last inspection in December 2012.

The latest report upgraded the school to “good” – the second highest mark – for making significant improvements, with staff creating an “environment in which learning flourishes".

But the primary missed out on the "outstanding" grade for occasionally failing to set difficult work and giving staff few opportunities to improve their skills. In a key move, it was also downgraded for limiting pupils’ “first-hand experience” of modern society.

The report said: "The large majority of pupils are white British. Very few are from other ethnic groups, and currently no pupils speak English as an additional language.

"The school needs to extend pupils' understanding of the cultural diversity of modern British Society by creating opportunities for them to have first-hand interaction with their counterparts from different backgrounds beyond the immediate vicinity.”

The school is now attempting to strike up a partnership with an inner city school to address the concerns.

Melonie Brunton, the head teacher, said school trips usually involved visits to the countryside, taking in farms and zoos, but it had recently focused on outings to a mosque and factory.

Ofsted’s comments were criticised by parents.

Jodie Miller, 35, whose six-year-old daughter attends the school, said: "We are a small rural community in Lincolnshire, there just aren't many children here from different backgrounds.

"The staff can't just wander the streets forcing people to come and attend.”

Benjamin Bannan, 33, a father-of-two, added: "It’s outrageous that a British school can be punished for being too British. It just doesn't make sense at all.

"We would welcome people from different cultures with open arms I'm sure - but there just aren't any ethnic minorities around here."

Reverend Charles Patrick, who was head of the governors at the time of the report, said: "This is a rural area, like 80 per cent of the country, we don't have many non-white residents.

"Perhaps it would be a different matter if we were in the middle of London or Manchester or something."

Ofsted denied that it was downgraded for one reason.

“The report highlights a small number of areas where the school should look to improve,” a spokesman said. “It was not denied an 'outstanding' judgement solely because of pupils’ cultural development.

“All schools must teach pupils about fundamental British values including mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs. That way they will be prepared for the future wherever they go.”
For those Americans who aren't acquainted with what in the USA is a rather rare and unusual book- which is to say, an atlas- Lincolnshire is about as typical of "middle England" as you can get. It is home to stolid, traditional towns and cities with stolid, traditional names like Horncastle, and Boston, and Lincoln, and Bardney. Its people are of a conservative sort- well, by European standards, anyway; remember, they're all socialists over here across the Pond- who overwhelmingly voted Tory in the last General Election.

Lincolnshire, as the article points out, is mostly rural and is typical of the rural heartland of England- its people are quiet, hard-working, and mostly white farmers. It's not a diverse environment, simply because you just don't see most blacks and Asians wanting to work and live on farms when they emigrate to other nations.

Yet the commissars of the establishment still want to impose "diversity" upon a part of the nation where there is none to be had, in the name of proper social engineering.

To put this sort of thing into an American context, this would be a lot like having Somalis on the ballots of lily-white districts in Minnesota and then electing them to pow- uh, wait, that's already happening, isn't it...

Contrary to what the article states, this isn't political correctness gone mad. Political correctness is madness to begin with.

The basic idea behind political correctness is to make people nicer to each other, more tolerant and forgiving of each other's foibles and follies. All it really does is turn whites into scapegoats and whipping boys. It forces whites to constantly apologise for their whiteness in the form of a weird ritualised auto-da-fe whereby whites must tear down their own culture and their own achievements, so as to make non-whites feel better about themselves.

It ultimately means avoiding hard truths and painful realities.

And in so doing, the insidious evil of political correctness sows the seeds of war.

This isn't difficult to figure out if you think about some simple examples.

It is considered politically incorrect in the extreme to point out that, for all of the virtues of individual well-socialised Muslims- if I may be so bold, I would like to take a page out of the Derb's book and shorten this to the acronym IWSMs- Islam is the world's most barbaric so-called "religion", which reduces free women to the status of chattel, promotes religious war, results in economic stagnation, and has certain peculiarly repeating patterns of expansion, decay, and collapse that no one seems to bother studying anymore.

It is considered even more politically incorrect to point out that ever since the Civil Rights era in both America and Europe, blacks have been singularly incapable of building, or even maintaining, civilisation and society in the inner cities- or anywhere else, for that matter. Black America used to be the most God-fearing, family-centred, and fundamentally downright decent segment of American society, once upon a time; today, black America is leading the headlong charge into the collapse of the country's once-great civilisation.

And it is considered the absolute height of political incorrectness to point out that importing millions of often illiterate and uneducated Mexicans to do the jobs that young Americans and blacks once did has not only destroyed social cohesion, but introduced a whole raft of other social ills at the same time. In this age of growing detachment from reality, the people in power are stupid enough to believe that allowing millions of people from the largely failed Central American states into predominantly white and Christian America will somehow magically convert those same invaders and barbarians into patriotic, flag-waving Americans.

War is ultimately what happens when reality intrudes upon fantasy, because war is essentially the end result of unstoppable forces meeting immovable objects. In the specific case of diversity, the unstoppable force of political correctness eventually slams headfirst into the immovable object of human nature.

This stems from one incontrovertible fact of human nature: we are highly territorial creatures, genetically and physically K-selected, adapted to a historical environment of scarce resources and hostile climate. It takes a very long time-span to rid us of these traits- that span is measured in thousands of years, not mere decades. It is a time-span that eclipses that of most civilisations and cultures, and these human traits always outlast the more stupid ideas that have come along whispering sweet nothings into our ears- the vaunted "democracy" of Athens collapsed into tyranny in a just a few generations; the Roman Empire lasted barely five hundred years in part because it succumbed to multiculturalism; and the American Century is already long gone.

And because we are territorial, because we have a built-in distrust of those who are not "like us", because we instinctively fear and dislike "the other", because it takes time and familiarity and (most importantly) shared values to overcome these worries, any headlong rush to push past these barriers will eventually cause such friction and tension that a rupture will be inevitable.

War is coming to the "diverse", "multicultural" societies of the West. We have already seen the opening shots being fired- the 2005 riots across France, and the London riots of 2010 and again in 2011, are merely a taste of what is to come. Europe believes that it is too sophisticated to experience a real war, but that is merely liberal self-delusion at work. The realities of human nature have not changed and the end result of multiculturalism will always be open war, genocide, and blood running in the streets.

Or, as the much-maligned British politician Enoch Powell put it:
For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organise to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided. As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood." 
That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect. Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century. 
Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now. Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know. All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal."

Comments

Popular Posts